Reinforcement Learning

The AI Frontier: from open weights to open research — Eiso Kant, Poolside AI

Jul 22, 2026 · 1:56:13

Poolside co-founder Eiso Kant argues that open weights and open research are essential for a future with many foundation model companies, and that models like their new Laguna S (118B parameters, 8B active) can achieve remarkable persistence and capability through post-training reinforcement learning. He explains how Poolside's Model Factory enables 5-8 week model cycles with 10,000-20,000 experiments per month, streaming data directly into training, and perfect reproducibility. Kant shares why Poolside embraced open source after starting as a closed company, criticizes MCP and tool calls in favor of models writing code directly, and predicts reinforcement learning will move earlier into pre-training. He also calls on researchers to start new foundation model companies to avoid an oligopoly of intelligence.

🔬 RL with Verifiable Rewards, but the Verifier is a Lab — Lila Sciences

Jul 16, 2026 · 1:41:04

Andy Beam (CTO) and Rafa Gómez-Bombarelli (Co-founder & CSO of Physical Sciences) of Lila Sciences argue that science is an 'infinite token generator' for AI, using reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards where the wet lab acts as the verifier. They claim one general model trained on ~10 trillion experimentally-verified reasoning tokens across biology, chemistry, and materials outperforms domain-specific models—'breadth gives us depth.' Their AI Science Factories treat the lab as a data center, with instruments on a 'PCI bus' and humans 'below the API line.' Highlights include a CAR-T candidate designed in six months by two or three people, 'monster UTRs' achieving ~10x Moderna/Pfizer mRNA expression, and the 'zero-FTE startup' business model. They discuss RL pathologies like collapsed chains of thought and a model that 'swears,' and note why there is still no AlphaFold for materials due to the sim-to-real gap.

Scaling Past Informal AI - Carina Hong, Axiom Math

Jun 3, 2026 · 1:33:04

Carina Hong, founder and CEO of Axiom Math, argues that formal verification, not informal RL, is the path to superintelligence, following her company's $200M Series A at a $1.6B valuation and a perfect 120/120 on the 2024 Putnam exam. Axiom's system uses Lean theorem prover data and reinforcement learning to produce verified proofs, achieving a 99% pass rate on the Verina code-with-proof benchmark (187 of 189 problems). Hong contends verification is about 'scaling brilliance' — not fixing hallucinations — and that only verified generation can compound AI reasoning. She explains Axiom's open-source Axle API for Lean at scale, addresses why frontier labs like OpenAI have deprioritized formal math (team departures, strategy shifts), and outlines a vision where verified reasoning transfers from math to code, hardware, and eventually AGI through self-improvement. She also discusses the Earth sciences challenge of autoformalization, the difficulty of search in mathematical literature (citing the Erdos controversy), and why fragmentation in the AI math field is a bottleneck.

The $15B Physical AI Company: Simulation, Autonomy OS, Neural Sim, & 1K Engineers—Applied Intuition

Apr 27, 2026 · 1:14:07

Applied Intuition co-founders Peter Ludwig and Qasar Younis argue that the real bottleneck in physical AI is deploying intelligence onto constrained hardware, not model intelligence itself. Their $15B company builds simulation, operating systems, and AI models for autonomous trucks, mining equipment, and defense systems. Starting as YC-era tooling for robotaxis, they now offer 30+ products across simulation & RL infrastructure, vehicle operating systems, and autonomy models. They compare fragmented vehicle software to pre-Android phones, and their OS enables reliable updates and L4 driverless operations (trucks running in Japan today). Verification uses statistical nines of reliability, and they internally adopt coding agents like Cursor and Claude Code. They hire 1,000 engineers at the hardware-software boundary.

Captaining IMO Gold, Deep Think, On-Policy RL, Feeling the AGI in Singapore — Yi Tay

Jan 23, 2026 · 1:32:05

Yi Tay, who leads Google DeepMind's Reasoning and AGI team in Singapore, explains how Gemini Deep Think achieved IMO Gold by abandoning symbolic AlphaProof for an end-to-end RL-trained model. He details the on-policy RL philosophy—models learn from their own generated outputs rather than imitating others—and the critical role of self-consistency through parallel sampling and internal verification. Tay describes the IMO effort: four co-captains in different time zones, a one-week training sprint, a live competition in Australia where researchers punched in problems as they were released, and the tension of waiting for human scores to determine the gold threshold. He discusses why the team believes one model must subsume everything for AGI, the data efficiency gap compared to humans, and his hiring focus on raw talent and research taste. Tay also shares his personal fitness transformation—losing 23 kilos and improving HRV—as integral to research productivity.

[NeurIPS Best Paper] 1000 Layer Networks for Self-Supervised RL — Kevin Wang et al, Princeton

Dec 31, 2025 · 28:19

Kevin Wang, Ishaan Javali, Michał Bortkiewicz, and Benjamin Eysenbach won the NeurIPS 2025 Best Paper award for RL1000, defying conventional wisdom by scaling reinforcement learning networks to 1,000 layers deep. They show that self-supervised RL—learning representations of states, actions, and future states via contrastive classification—scales where value-based methods collapse, and that critical architectural tricks (residual connections, layer norm, classification instead of regression) unlock performance that multiplies beyond a critical depth. Scaling depth is more parameter-efficient (linear growth) than width (quadratic growth), and Jax GPU-accelerated environments enable collecting hundreds of millions of transitions in hours, providing the data abundance that makes scaling possible. The paper argues that RL is finally ready to scale like language and vision, not by throwing compute at value functions, but by borrowing self-supervised objectives, with implications for robotics via goal-conditioned RL without human supervision or demonstrations, and deployment via deep teacher, shallow student distillation.

[State of Post-Training] From GPT-4.1 to 5.1: RLVR, Agent & Token Efficiency — Josh McGrath, OpenAI

Dec 31, 2025 · 27:34

Josh McGrath, an OpenAI post-training researcher, states that real post-training innovation lies in data quality and signal trust, not optimization methods, with RLVR and token efficiency central. He moved from pre-training (3% compute gains) to post-training (40% behavior change), describes the infrastructure chaos of RL runs, and cites GRPO from DeepSeek Math as underappreciated for providing verifiable reward signals. GPT-5 to GPT-5.1 bumped evals while slashing tokens, emphasizing token efficiency over wall-clock time. The shopping model features interruptibility and chain-of-thought transparency, and personality toggles (Anton vs Clippy) are a key differentiator. For long context, he argues agents with graph walks may be more important than 10M-token windows. He concludes that the education system fails to produce people skilled in both distributed systems and ML research, a critical combination as bottlenecks shift.

[State of RL/Reasoning] IMO/IOI Gold, OpenAI o3/GPT-5, and Cursor Composer — Ashvin Nair, Cursor

Dec 30, 2025 · 45:13

Ashvin Nair, now ML lead at Cursor, traces his path from Berkeley robotics and an OpenAI Dota-era internship to OpenAI's reasoning team (which grew from a dozen to 300+ people) and explains why IOI Gold in 2022 felt like solving AI but didn't change the world—because RL doesn't generalize beyond training distribution. He argues most RL research from 2017-2022 overfit to benchmarks, rewarding complex ideas over simple ones that scale. At Cursor, he sees a unique opportunity for continual learning with policy updates every two hours and product-model co-design, keeping engineers in the loop instead of context-switching. His bet is that the next paradigm shift is continual learning with infinite memory: models experience something once and never forget it, storing millions of deployment tokens in weights without overloading capacity.

[State of AI Startups] Memory/Learning, RL Envs & DBT-Fivetran — Sarah Catanzaro, Amplify

Dec 30, 2025 · 28:43

Sarah Catanzaro of Amplify Partners argues that the DBT-Fivetran merger was not the death of the modern data stack but a path to IPO targeting $600M+ combined revenue, that data catalogs failed because they were built for humans rather than machines, and that RL environments are a fad. She notes that frontier labs use dbt and Fivetran for training data curation and agent analytics, and criticizes $100M+ seed rounds raised without near-term roadmaps. For 2026, she identifies personalization via memory and continual learning as the key retention unlock, observing that AI founders are unfamiliar with growth concepts like k-factor. She prefers real-world logs over synthetic RL environments, citing Cursor's use of user activity, and says the most exciting startups combine hard research problems (RAG, rule-following, continual learning) with applications that were previously impossible.

Greg Brockman on OpenAI's Road to AGI

Aug 15, 2025 · 1:08:37

Greg Brockman, OpenAI co-founder and president, explains how GPT-5's hybrid reasoning and aggressive pricing advance the road to AGI, while releasing GPT-OSS for open source. He traces reasoning evolution from GPT-4 via reinforcement learning, noting Dota's pure RL success and IMO gold's direct transfer to IOI gold. Brockman details GPT-5's router that hides model choice from users, and says pricing has dropped ~10X per year since GPT-4. He argues compute remains the bottleneck, but connecting AI to real-world domains like healthcare is still wide open. Brockman adds that ARC Institute's DNA models are identical to language models, and that more problems emerge over time—it's never too late to contribute.

The RLVR Revolution — with Nathan Lambert (AI2, Interconnects.ai)

Jul 31, 2025 · 1:19:00

Nathan Lambert from AI2 explains the RLVR (Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards) revolution, arguing that verifiable rewards for math, code, and instruction-following are scaling more reliably than human feedback, and that open models like Tulu 3 can match frontier labs on core evals with just 10-15 tasks vs. hundreds. He traces overoptimization through three phases—control, RLHF, and RLVR—and warns that models learn to cheat unit tests unless reward design penalizes it. He analyzes o3's search-heavy approach (e.g., 80 websites per query), hybrid reasoning models like Gemini 2.5 and Claude, and predicts that pure reasoning models will become the default as inference costs drop. Lambert introduces a four-skill taxonomy for agent models—skills, calibration, strategy, abstraction—and says planning improvements often come from mundane data fixes. He advocates for fully open models, citing AI2's Olmo 32B as approaching GPT-4 level, but notes that building an 'American DeepSeek' requires massive resources and nonprofit constraints.

⚡️Using RFT to Build Clinical Superintelligence

Jul 29, 2025 · 26:58

Brendan Fortuner, Head of Eng at Ambience AI, explains how the healthcare startup uses OpenAI's reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) to build clinical AI assistants that help doctors automate note-taking and ICD-10 coding, saving up to two hours per day. Ambience, deployed at health systems like Cleveland Clinic, listens to patient conversations via a mobile app, transcribes them, and generates structured documentation directly into EHRs. Fortuner details how RFT replaced traditional supervised fine-tuning for objective medical tasks, using programmable graders to optimize for real-world outcomes like F1 scores on ICD-10 codes—improving o3-mini from clinician-level 40% to 57%. He describes reward hacking issues, such as models inflating findings or using layman terms, and how they constrained graders with style weights. The episode also covers domain expert vs. ML engineer collaboration, the cost of LLM graders (burning $25K on one experiment), and Ambience's hiring focus on clinician-researcher unicorns who combine domain expertise with an experimentalist mindset.

⚡️Multi-Turn RL for Multi-Hour Agents — with Will Brown, Prime Intellect

May 23, 2025 · 38:59

This episode features Will Brown of Prime Intellect discussing Claude 4's emphasis on agentic tool use over pure reasoning, the controversy around Claude's safety stress-testing results (including alleged dark web uranium searches), and his team's paper on multi-turn reinforcement learning for LLM agents. Brown explains how turn-level credit assignment in GRPO can incentivize proper tool use while avoiding reward hacking, and argues that flexible LLM-based reward models will replace brittle deterministic parsers. He also critiques LMArena's funding model and calls for academia to lead in evaluation research.

⚡️Open Questions in Agentic RL — Will Brown (Prime Intellect)

May 9, 2025 · 17:13

Will Brown of Prime Intellect maps the frontier of open-source agentic reinforcement learning, arguing that training models like o3 requires multi-turn tool use, intermediate reward verification, and efficient context management. He outlines challenges such as scaling tool calls to hundreds (e.g., Deep Research's 100 calls), assigning credit across long chains, and avoiding context blow-up from websites or images. Key solutions include async RL pipelines to hide compute inefficiencies, offloading sub-tasks to small models as tool calls, and using reasoning reward models for step-level verification. Brown highlights progress in model merging for decentralized skill acquisition, where specialized models trained on code, math, or other tasks can be weight-averaged effectively. The talk concludes that while hard, these problems are solvable via open-source recipes, infrastructure, and community collaboration.

What is an RL environment? w/ Nous Research's Roger Jin

Apr 29, 2025 · 15:27

Roger Jin of Nous Research explains why reinforcement learning (RL) environments are critical for training open-source language models, arguing that RL overcomes supervised learning's limitations—handling non-differentiable rewards, multi-step objectives, and negative feedback—while enabling models to surpass expert labelers. He motivates a standard environment abstraction to scale to millions of environments, mirroring the data-scaling era. Nous's infrastructure separates trainer, inference, and environment manager microservices, with environments as independent microservices running async. The minimal interface combines `get_item` (data loading/curriculum) and `collect_trajectories` (fused inference + scoring) to support multi-turn and multi-agent setups. Environments return raw tokens, allowing custom chat templates, token-level advantage overrides, and extensibility like per-environment attention masking. This design aims to unify open-source RL training and foster a shared pool of environments.

Solve coding, solve AGI [Reflection.ai launch w/ CEO Misha Laskin]

Mar 7, 2025 · 28:12

Misha Laskin of Reflection AI argues that solving autonomous coding is the direct path to AGI, combining reinforcement learning (pioneered by his team on AlphaGo/AlphaZero) with large language models (which they advanced at Google on PaLM, Gemini, ChatGPT). He explains that coding is already ergonomic for LLMs—unlike browser agents that require noisy human mouse data—making it the ideal starting point. Reflection AI is building coding agents that automate backlog tasks (testing, refactoring, migrations, security remediation) for large engineering teams, delivering them via an API that takes a task and codebase and outputs resolved code. Laskin insists superintelligence cannot be built in a vacuum; real-world customer evals are essential, as benchmarks like SWE-bench don't guarantee production reliability. He also stresses the need for open-weight models to prevent a few companies from hoarding superintelligent coding agents.

The State of Reasoning — from Nathan Lambert, Interconnects/AI2 [LS Live @ NeurIPS 2024]

Jan 2, 2025 · 16:22

Nathan Lambert argues that language models do perform reasoning, contrary to skeptics, and that embracing chain-of-thought and reinforcement learning (RL) is key to advancing their capabilities. He explains OpenAI's o1 as large-scale RL on verifiable outcomes, noting that post-training flops exceed pre-training, and highlights relatives like DeepSeek and Qwen which are narrower. Lambert details OpenAI's new reinforcement fine-tuning API, which uses the same infrastructure as o1 and requires only dozens of labeled samples, and contrasts it with process reward models or Monte Carlo tree search. He presents his own project using RL on math evaluations (GSM8K, MATH, AFeval) to show gentle RL fine-tuning can boost specific capabilities without degrading general performance. The talk concludes that reasoning is worth pursuing and that new, less-human-like forms of model reasoning are emerging.

The Origin and Future of RLHF: the secret ingredient for ChatGPT - with Nathan Lambert

Jan 11, 2024 · 1:35:27

Dr. Nathan Lambert traces the origin and future of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), the secret ingredient behind ChatGPT, explaining how it evolved from robotics and early preference learning to become the core alignment technique for large language models. He details the three-phase process (instruction tuning, preference data collection, RL optimization), noting that RLHF's data costs for LLaMA2 were around $6–8 million, and that synthetic data from GPT-4 is cheaper and often more accurate than human labels. Lambert contrasts DPO with PPO, arguing DPO is simpler but may have lower peak performance. He discusses emerging methods like Constitutional AI, which uses AI-generated critiques based on principles, and highlights the challenge of evaluating RLHF models, noting GPT-4 Turbo's lead over earlier versions. The episode covers open questions about data aggregation, reward model agreement (65–75%), and the need for qualitative model interaction.